Friday, July 1, 2011

After man illegally sold guns, some went south

Posted Thursday, Jun. 30, 2011
A Fort Worth man illegally sold dozens of guns to "almost anybody" and some were recovered across the border in violence-plagued Mexico, a federal official told the Star-Telegram.
 
Before it was over, Myron McPhate, a security alarm installer, had guns drawn on him by police officers who pulled him off Interstate 20.
 
"They're all laid over the hood with guns drawn saying, 'Get out of the car! Get out of the car!'" McPhate said in an interview. "Everybody's freaking out in the van. I told my wife ... just sit still."
 
Now, after pleading guilty to dealing in firearms without a license, he faces up to five years in federal prison.
 
McPhate, 53, said he didn't realize his sale of firearms was illegal. He says he sold them at gun shows, and he didn't have a license. While under surveillance by authorities, McPhate was also photographed selling guns, including semiautomatic rifles with large-capacity magazines, at a Jack in the Box restaurant in Grand Prairie. Those arms eventually made their way south.
 
"I did not intentionally know these guns were going to Mexico," he said.
 
Evidence shows that many of the firearms fueling Mexican drug violence have come from the United States, including a growing number of increasingly lethal weapons from gun shops and shows in Texas, California and Arizona, according to federal reports.
 
Even small dealers are contributing to the problem, experts say. A professor who has studied violence in Mexico says the right kind of gun can fetch thousands of dollars from gang and cartel members.
 
McPhate said the charge against him was based on his selling about 100 guns. In addition to prison, he faces a fine of up to $250,000 when he is scheduled to be sentenced later this month.
 
Some of the guns have been recovered locally, others at the U.S.-Mexico border and in Mexico, said the federal official who had some knowledge of the case.
 
McPhate said agents with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives recovered 38 of his guns and "none of them, according to their records, was ever used in a crime, thank God."
 
McPhate also forfeited 15 firearms stored in a gun safe at his home, including a .223-caliber rifle, two .45-caliber pistols, shotguns, six 9 mm pistols, a .44-caliber Smith & Wesson revolver and several others pistols.
 
A court document known as a factual résumé also shows that McPhate sold a Masterpiece Arms MPA 45, described as a .45-caliber pistol, to an undercover ATF agent. The pistol was not part of his personal collection, nor were any of the guns he resold from January 2009 to September, the document says.
 
Gun owners may legally sell guns from their personal collection; however, a federal firearms license is required to engage in the business of selling guns.
 
McPhate said he started selling guns he had owned for years for extra money after gaining custody of his four grandchildren from Child Protective Services. He sold the weapons at a gun show, saw other dealers' success and then started buying arms and selling guns himself. He said he did it mostly for the "fellowshipping" and making a little money.
 
Over two years, he said, he bought about 200 guns.
 
McPhate said he bought used guns for $300 that might have retailed new at $500. He said he sold those for $325.
 
Robert Taylor, professor of public affairs and justice administration at the University of Texas at Dallas, said the resale can be much more lucrative. Something that costs $1,200 here can end up selling for $5,000 in Mexico.
 
"If you've got a fully automatic weapon and you're selling to folks down there, you can get a tremendous amount of money," Taylor said.
 
In October, McPhate said, ATF agents contacted him and "ransacked" his home. They told him they wanted him to be an informant, gathering evidence at gun shows to implicate other dealers.
 
McPhate told the ATF agents that he wanted immunity and his family in witness protection because "some of the guns went to Mexico. ... If they find out that I snitched them out, I said they're going to have retaliations."
 
The agents wouldn't do that, he said. "You're still going to jail when it's over," he said an agent told him.
 
McPhate eventually agreed to cooperate to keep his wife out of trouble, he said. But as the months passed, he said, the agents didn't feel he had kept up contact with them.
On Valentine's Day, McPhate and his family were going to look at a home when four police cars pulled in behind him on the interstate.
 
McPhate was handcuffed and taken to jail. He was released and immediately taken into custody by ATF agents. He pleaded guilty, believing he might get probation. However, the selling of guns at the fast-food restaurant added an element of gun trafficking to his crime, he said.
 
He said he doesn't think he'll get the maximum sentence.
 
"Now I'm looking at 24 to 48 months in the federal pen," he said, adding that he believes his grandchildren will be taken by authorities and split up because his wife does not have custody of them. McPhate, who said he served in the Marines, said his only previous legal trouble was for writing a hot check, which he paid off.
 
McPhate says he wishes he had known what he was doing was wrong. "I feel bad," he said. "I did not intentionally know these guns were going to Mexico."
 
U.S. and Mexican government officials have said that Mexican drug organizations arrange for the trafficking of most guns into Mexico, according to a 2009 report by the Government Accountability Office.
 
ATF eTrace data showed that between fiscal years 2004 and 2008, more than 20,000 firearms, or 87 percent, that were seized by Mexican authorities and could be traced had originated in the United States.
 
Taylor, the UTD professor, said some gun sellers are quick to report suspicious activity to authorities. But other gun sellers, he said, clearly know that their guns are headed to Mexico for use in violent crimes.
 
During his regular visits to the border, Taylor said, he has seen 15 or 20 bodies, hands bound behind their backs, of people assassinated on a street.
 
"It's pretty ugly," he said.
Darren Barbee, 817-390-7126

Thursday, June 30, 2011

'Fast and Furious' sparks new gun control debates

ATF recovered U.S. weapons in Mexico after losing track of them

By DAN FREEDMAN/HOUSTON CHRONICLE/June 29, 2011, 11:36PM


With federal agents testifying against their commanders, members of Congress calling for the top man's ouster and accusations that ATF is fudging its gun smuggling numbers, the political fallout itself has become fast and furious.
The operation, conducted jointly with agents from ATF, FBI, DEA and other agencies was aimed at reaching beyond the low-level "straw purchasers" of weapons and building a complex case against Mexican traffickers and their weapons brokers.

Firearms reach cartels

But the weapons purchased in gun stores in and around Phoenix, as many as 2,500, got away from ATF surveillance and eventually reached the cartels in Mexico. Two of them were recovered in December at the site in Southern Arizona where smugglers killed Border Patrol agent Brian Terry.

At his news conference Wednesday, President Barack Obama said letting guns go to Mexico "would not be an appropriate step by the ATF, and we've got to find out how that happened. ... As soon as the investigation is completed, appropriate actions will be taken."

On Capitol Hill, Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, have been demanding answers from Department of Justice officials.

ATF defenders, some of them retired agents, say the problem of guns from U.S. sources winding up in Mexico is a border-wide phenomenon, and Fast and Furious is just an operation gone wrong in a sea of other cases that ended in convictions.

"The problem of guns from the U.S. ending up in Mexico goes well beyond Fast and Furious, and it was there well before Fast and Furious got started," said Michael Bouchard, the ATF's assistant director for field operations from 2004 until his retirement in 2007.

The operation yielded an indictment in January that named 20 defendants, all low-level purchasers. The indictment identified purchases of 681 guns, including 589 AK-47s.
The political uproar is just the latest battle line in the long war over gun rights versus gun control. Issa and Grassley are widely considered folk heroes to gun-rights advocates who fear liberal Democrats using U.S. guns in Mexico as fodder for more firearms restrictions.

"We've been involved in this issue ever since various folks - the president of Mexico (Felipe Calderon) and President Obama - accused firearms dealers operating legally under the Second Amendment of being the source of violence in Mexico,“ said Andrew Arulanandam, spokesman for the National Rifle Association. "They're the ones advocating more gun control as a means of addressing the problem across the border."
Today, Democrats are sponsoring a forum focused on stopping the weapons flow through gun law "improvements."

Senators Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., and Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., issued a report earlier this month, "Halting U.S. Firearms Trafficking to Mexico" that called for reinstatement of the assault weapons ban and an ATF-proposed requirement that firearms dealers report multiple purchases of assault-type weapons to the agency. They based the report on ATF data claiming 20,504 of 29,284 guns recovered in Mexico in 2009 and 2010 and submitted for tracing were U.S. sourced firearms.

That's 70 percent of the total 29,284 guns traced those years.

Ongoing investigations

According to ATF, 1,573 defendants faced charges related to firearms trafficking from 2006 to 2010 under Project Gunrunner, the ATF's five-year effort to combat weapons trafficking to Mexico. The agency has 4,600 on-going Gunrunner investigations in border jurisdictions, an ATF spokesman said.

Gun rights advocates who say ATF data is suspect point out that officials last year said 90 percent of guns traced from Mexico originated in the U.S., then downgraded it to 70 percent this year. Grassley wrote to ATF Acting Director Kenneth Melson challenging the 70 percent calculation.

"Unfortunately, this information paints a grossly inaccurate picture of the situation," he said, citing ATF figures he has showing only a quarter of weapons were traceable to the U.S.

A Hearst Newspapers survey last month of 44 gun prosecutions in Texas, Arizona, California, Nevada, Oklahoma and New Mexico pinpointed a total of 1,600 U.S.-purchased guns by brand name that were recovered in Mexico or intercepted en route.
dan@hearstdc.com


Read more: http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/chronicle/7633343.html#ixzz1QkW30osC

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Tighten U.S. gun laws, stop terrorists: mayors

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
WASHINGTON -- America's love affair with guns is a passionate and enduring one, the bonds strengthening even further in recent years thanks to the country's powerful pro-gun lobby.

But could the prospect of al-Qaida terrorists exploiting U.S. gun loopholes to purchase weapons for sinister purposes change historic attitudes about the right to bear arms in America?

A group of more than 600 urban mayors is clearly hoping recent remarks by Adam Gadahn, an American-born spokesman for al-Qaida now known as Azzam al-Amriki, might strike a chord of fear in a country still deeply traumatized by the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

In a national advertising campaign that kicked off Tuesday, the Coalition of Mayors Against Illegal Guns, founded by New York mayor Michael Bloomberg, is drawing attention to Gadahn's call for would-be terrorists to take advantage of some of the most lax gun laws on the planet.

A TV spot, airing for a week on several major U.S. networks, features Gadahn telling followers how easy it is to attend gun shows and walk away with a variety of high-powered assault weapons without having to submit to a background check.
"This is a golden opportunity," Gadahn says in the ad.

"America is absolutely awash with easily obtainable firearms. You can go down to a gun show ... and come away with a fully automatic assault rifle without a background check. So what are you waiting for?"

Gadahn is wrong -- consumers can purchase semi-automatics at gun shows, not fully automatic assault weapons -- but private sellers at such events are not, in fact, required to perform the same background checks on customers as their federally licensed dealers.

Bloomberg said Gadahn's remarks should serve as a wake-up call to the U.S. Congress.

"Criminals already know how to take advantage of gaps in our gun laws, and now al-Qaida knows too," he said Tuesday in a statement.

"You are checked against the terror watchlist to board an airplane, but you don't have to be checked when buying assault weapons. Weak gun laws aren't just a crime problem, they're a national security threat."

Federal reports suggest terror suspects have already managed to purchase more than 1,300 weapons in the United States since 2004.

Shortly after Gadahn made his call to arms earlier this month, several pro-gun control groups wrote to U.S. President Barack Obama, urging him to push for tighter gun laws.

"The time is now to act to prevent a large-scale terror attack with firearms," the letter read.

"The United States' weak gun laws are well-known throughout the terrorist community and today act as a beacon for lone wolves and small groups of terrorists with few resources seeking to inflict maximum damage."

The mayors have been pressuring Congress for years to close the private-seller loophole.

The Justice Department has said that the Obama administration supports closing the gun-show loophole, but various pieces of gun-control legislation, including one that would address the loophole, are floundering in Congress.

Republicans in the House of Representatives even voted down a proposal in May that would have prevented those on the FBI's terrorist watchlist from purchasing firearms.

-- The Canadian Press

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/world/tighten-us-gun-laws-stop-terrorists-mayors-124695809.html

Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Why the concealed gun law allowed prosecutors to quit gun boards

Published: Monday, June 27, 2011, 6:31 AM     Updated: Monday, June 27, 2011, 10:19 AM
Ten years after lawmakers made it easier for Michigan residents to carry concealed handguns, Juris Kaps hasn't changed his mind about removing himself from his county's gun board.

Just as was his stance in 2001, the Van Buren County prosecutor wants no part of the law's “shall issue” process, in which 95 percent of applicants received concealed permits last year.

“I have a lot of things to do and I've got better things to do than be a rubber stamp,” said Kaps, prosecutor in the county since 1982. “Why would I want to waste time doing that?”

Twelve Michigan prosecuting attorneys have chosen not to sit on their counties' concealed weapons licensing boards, a Booth Michigan survey of the state's 83 prosecutors found.

The counties include nearly 40 percent of the population eligible for the permits, ages 21 and older. Four of the state's 10 largest counties are among them - Wayne, Kent, Washtenaw and Kalamazoo.


Prior to the law's passage, it was mandatory for prosecutors to sit on their county gun boards. The new legislation let them opt out.

“They were totally against the bill and they did not want to be on the board that mandated that they had to give a gun to someone, the right to carry the gun, if they didn't like them,” said state Sen. Mike Green, R-Mayville, who as a state representative was primary sponsor of Michigan's “shall-issue” concealed weapons law.

“We said, 'OK, fine. You don't want to be on the board, good. We'll get somebody else, get somebody that cares.'”

In their place, the law allows a licensed firearms instructor to be appointed by the county board. The three-person panel also includes a representative from the state police and county sheriff's department. The county clerk acts as secretary.

Initially after the law took effect on July 1, 2001, 17 prosecutors excused themselves from their county gun boards.

Kaps was part of that original group, as were his counterparts in three nearby counties: Allegan's Fred Anderson, Kent's William Forsyth, and Kalamazoo's Jim Gregart. Gregart retired in 2003. His successor, Jeff Fink, also chose not to join the board.
Their reasons differ.

Anderson, Allegan County's prosecutor for 19 years, ended his membership two days after the law took effect.

In his July 3, 2001, letter to the chairman of the county Board of Commissioners, Anderson said he expected to face “an increased number of conflict of interest issues” in that he would also be responsible for prosecuting any criminal violations committed by a license holder.

“If I'm not disqualified, as prosecutor, I am not only the prosecuting official, but also the judge and jury in the license revocation process, not a desirable situation.”

He also said in a recent interview that his dual role as the county's civil attorney would place him in the position of providing legal advice to the body during meetings that are completely open to the public.

For others, the situation wasn't as complicated.

In Hillsdale County, Prosecutor Neal Brady said he did not want to “take the easy way out” by opting off.

“I wanted to be part of this new process and see how it turned out from the inside as opposed to dismissing it altogether,” said Brady, prosecutor the past 15 years. “I thought that not being involved would not be serving the public that I was elected to serve.”

Jackson County Prosecutor Henry Zavislak, who has served for eight years, also said he saw little benefit in excusing himself from a board on which he had served as an assistant prosecutor. He admits he had concerns in 2001 that putting more firearms in residents' hands could have negative consequences.

That phenomenon never came to pass, he said. Kaps, who said he shared Zavislak's fears, agreed.

Of 24 charges filed last year against concealed license holders in Van Buren, many were for alcohol offenses or misdemeanor assaults. Just four involved people with guns: resisting an officer, possessing a gun while intoxicated, assault with a dangerous weapon, and reckless discharge of a firearm.

“The incidents that have occurred have been isolated,” Kaps said. “I think that the whole situation has been much more of a non-issue … To a certain extent I would have to concede that, and I would have to concede that I was wrong.”

Still, Kaps said his other “philosophical” concerns about the law and the way gun boards operate have not waned.

He also has concerns that gun boards are issuing licenses without access to any database that tracks residents with mental illness or who “are not equipped to carry a firearm.” While gun boards are able to conduct criminal background searches, the absence of a true check on their mental health is a concern.

“There was no way of checking it and it was, 'OK, do I really want to get into a situation where my stamp of approval is on someone who is mentally deranged?'”
© 2011 MLive.com. All rights reserved.

Monday, June 27, 2011

mlive.com

Lawyers, guns and money: a day inside the Genesee County gun board

Published: Sunday, June 26, 2011, 11:00 AM
GENESEE COUNTY, Michigan — For Kurt Weiss, it all came down to one vote.
If Genesee County Assistant Prosecutor Tim Cassady voted yes, Weiss got to keep his concealed pistol license. If it was a no, then the Flint man had a tough choice to make:
Give up his license to carry a concealed weapon or forfeit his medical marijuana card.

View full sizeMichigan State Police Lt. Stephen Sipes Genesee (left) and County Sheriff's Lt. Matthew Rule go over some issues they have with a CCW applicant during a gun board meeting at the Genesee County Clerks office in Flint.
Weiss, 36, was ticketed in September for failing to tell a police officer he had his gun on him. To have his license reinstated after a six-month suspension, he was called into a recent meeting of the county’s concealed weapon licensing board.

His is just one of 200 licenses that members of the Genesee County gun board had before them to review at a recent meeting.

The board is one of the busiest in the state, meeting twice per month in a clerk’s office conference room — but rarely does anyone from the public take notice.

In counties across the state, gun boards are tasked with carrying out the state law. They depend on a process of record keeping that is filled with spotty reporting and lax oversight, a Booth Michigan investigation found.

For example, boards across the state regularly neglect to file required year-end reports to the state — including Genesee County last year.
Their job is not easy.

The law thrusts a hefty workload on local boards with limited resources. Counties collect $41 of the $105 application fee.

“My personal opinion is that the county doesn’t get a fair share of that fee considering that all the record keeping is done here,” said Doreen Fulcher, elections supervisor at the clerk’s office. “In the month of March 2011, we processed almost 600 applications. And we have a staff of four.”

The county has nearly 14,000 people approved to carry concealed weapons — trailing only Macomb, Oakland and Wayne counties, the Booth investigation found.

The gun board includes a group of officials representing the sheriff, prosecutor, county clerk and state police. It meets twice a month to approve, deny, revoke or suspend licenses to carry a concealed weapon, called CCWs for short.

When board members aren’t meeting with license holders or applicants, they go through applications and renewals — pre-reviewed by the clerk’s representative — with an assembly line precision.

Unlike some counties, Genesee’s clerk, prosecutor and sheriff send representatives to the meeting rather than appearing themselves.

Genesee County Sheriff’s Capt. Chris Swanson and Michigan State Police Sgt. Jeff Bauermeister regularly look to Cassady for questions about laws and violations.

The pounding of rubber stamps on paper sets the tempo in the room like a metronome.
“I need to get new ink,” Swanson says at one point.

Deputy Clerk Cathy Cole represents the clerk’s office, which doesn’t vote but handles the bulk of paperwork and clerical duties.

Gun boards across the state tend to have their own style. For example, some make all applicants show up in person. In Genesee County, the board calls applicants in for unusual or contentious cases — like Weiss’s.

If the Genesee County board was ever a stiff, formal affair, those conventions were abandoned long ago.

“Why would a guy born in 1922 want a CCW?” Bauermeister says of one application. “Where’s he gonna go?”

Typically only a handful of current or aspiring CCW holders appear in person each month. Weiss was one of four at the April meeting.

The board denied the woman and man with convictions, but approved the man whose brother raised concerns.

“I don’t find anything (that merits a revocation),” Swanson said, before turning to question the applicant.

“Why do you want a CCW, sir?” Swanson asked.

“Self protection,” he responded.

“Can’t disagree with that,” Swanson said.

Weiss’s case would normally be a run-of-the-mill suspension for the board. Then the medical marijuana issue came to light and behooved the board to take a stand.

Genesee County Sheriff’s Capt. Chris Swanson voted yes. Michigan State Police Sgt. Jeff Bauermeister voted no, based on advice from MSP’s legal council.

With their split vote, the decision on whether Weiss’s license should be reinstated was left up to Cassady.

Cassady told Weiss he’s checked with the U.S. Attorney’s office, which assures him they have no intention of prosecuting against CCW holders violating federal law by following the medical marijuana law Michigan voters passed in 2008.

“So based upon that, since you’re in compliance with state law ... it’s the position of the prosecutor to vote yes,” Cassady said.

Weiss breathed a sigh of relief. He didn’t expect things to work out in his favor.

“I was a little caught off-guard by your decision,” he said. “So thank you.”

It was all in a day’s work for the county’s gun board.
© 2011 MLive.com. All rights reserved.

Sunday, June 26, 2011

Worst fears about concealed guns never materialized, but permits can't be credited for crime drop either

Published: Sunday, June 26, 2011, 7:02 AM

Sandwiched between two speakers armed with anti-gun analysis, Steve Dulan had his own ammunition.

For 10 minutes, the East Lansing lawyer and firearms instructor talked about Michigan’s concealed handgun law, the explosion in permits, and the evidence that license holders are more law-abiding than others.

He pointed to statistics on concealed permit holders the state issues each year.
“It’s a dramatic difference,” Dulan told a gun-rights symposium that Friday in February. “The quarter million of us adults in Michigan (with permits), we commit virtually no crime versus the general population.”

Today, he says he is disappointed an investigation by Booth newspapers found the reports he cited are inaccurate. But his conviction is unwavering: A lawfully armed society is safer, and those with permits are the most lawful of all.

“Even allowing for significant reporting errors, it’s still so dramatically different that it’s persuasive,” Dulan said.

When state lawmakers 10 years ago made it easier to carry a concealed gun, supporters said a better-armed society would deter crime. Opponents predicted the opposite.

A decade later, many critics concede fears of inordinate violence have not materialized.
However, two prominent criminologists — who often disagree on the topic of guns — agree on this: The law has not had a significant impact on crime rates.
“Looking at statistics, crime has not gone up and crime has not gone down as a result of passing these laws,” said Gary Kleck, an often-cited Florida State University professor generally skeptical of gun control.
Kleck’s studies suggest, however, there are some 2.5 million defensive uses of guns annually. He said 98 percent do not involve shootings.
“They’ll pull out a gun and threaten. They’ll allude (to having a weapon),” he said. “People rarely shoot the gun trying to kill somebody.”
Many defensive uses go unreported, he added. A permit holder might be reluctant to file a report fearing he or she unwittingly did something wrong. “There’s nothing to be gained from it,” Kleck said.
David McDowall, a professor at the University at Albany, State University of New York, has sparred with Kleck over various gun issues.
He agrees allowing law-abiding people to carry firearms “hasn’t had much impact on crime or on public life in general.”

But he said pro-gun forces overstate defensive uses. He put the number at probably 100,000 a year.
“There’s some people who claim it’s very frequent, but I think the best studies show it’s very infrequent,” he said.

Concealed handgun supporters often cite research by John Lott, a criminologist who has held positions at the universities of Maryland and Chicago. His book is titled “More Guns, Less Crime.” Others have spent considerable energy discrediting his analysis.

Violent crime in Michigan is falling, from 575 per 100,000 people in 1999 to 497 per 100,000 in 2009, according to FBI statistics. That’s a nearly 14 percent dip in the number of violent crimes per 100,000 people.

The crime rate is also down nationally, from 523 per 100,000 in 1999 to 429 in 2009, for a nearly 18 percent decline in the number of violent crimes per 100,000 people.

Michigan State University criminology professor Timothy Bynum said there are too many variables to say more guns equal less crime, or the opposite. “It’s a really big leap,” said Bynum, who directs the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data, an inter-university consortium at the University of Michigan.

U-M professor Edward Rothman, director of the Center for Statistical Consultation and Research, agreed to do an analysis for Booth newspapers on whether permit holders are more law abiding. The effort had to be abandoned, however, because the state’s reports were so incomplete.

But Kleck believes license holders are more law abiding, given the simple fact they must have a clean background check. If a license holder is arrested, it’s usually unrelated to a firearm, he added.

That’s not the perspective Dulan heard as he spoke that February afternoon between representatives from the Coalition to Stop Violence and the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence.

Dulan is an adjunct professor at Thomas M. Cooley Law School, a former infantry sergeant, a gun trainer and a concealed permit holder. He also is a board member of the Michigan Coalition for Responsible Gun Owners, whose efforts helped relax Michigan’s concealed weapon law 10 years ago this week.

The state reports he referenced details about 1,000 crimes committed by some 250,000 licensees the most recent year. That’s about 250 crimes per 100,000 license holders, he noted. For the entire population, the rate was about 3,300 crimes per 100,000 people, he said.

Even given state records are significantly flawed — 14 counties did not file that year and others under-reported convictions — Dulan said license holders are far more likely to toe the line. They undergo training, expense and are “so afraid of losing the license they tend to err on the side of caution,” he said.

“Bad guys, they get a gun and put it in their pocket.”

http://www.mlive.com/news/index.ssf/2011/06/worst_fears_about_concealed_gu.html