Saturday, January 22, 2011

Sandhill crane hunting proposal delayed

Two-year wait will be used to study crane population

Anne Paine
http://www.tennessean.com/article/20110122/NEWS01/101220327/-1/sports0101/Proposal-hunt-sandhill-cranes-delayed

A proposal to hunt sandhill cranes in Tennessee was laid to rest Friday — at least for now.

The Tennessee Wildlife Resources Commission voted to delay consideration of the plan for two years. It had raised concerns among birders and some hunters as well.
Commissioner Mitchell Parks made a motion Friday for a one- rather than two-year wait, which failed to rally support.

"I don't see the need of dragging this out forever," he said.

Commissioner Eric Wright had said the day before that a wait was to learn more about the crane population and to allow conflicting groups to try to work together.
Public comments gathered on the proposal showed 72 percent opposed a season on cranes, while 28 percent supported it. A telephone poll resulted in a closer margin, 37 percent opposed to 32 percent.

The Tennessee Wildlife Federation had pushed the state wildlife agency to consider the hunt, and the Tennessee Farm Bureau backed it, saying the birds damage crops.
The eastern population of sandhill cranes, which nearly disappeared in the 1930s, has been growing. The birds stop on migration, feeding and resting at the Hiwassee Refuge northeast of Chattanooga, and are celebrated at an annual crane festival that draws thousands of visitors.

Questions still unanswered

Questions remain about the sustainability of hunting the red-capped birds, according to the Tennessee Ornithological Society.

They reproduce slowly, unlike many hunted species, and aren't comparable to two sandhill crane populations to the west that are hunted, group members said. They want the festival turned into an eco-travel jewel that brings money to the state and wildlife agency.

Mike Butler, CEO of the wildlife federation, said some biologists say the population could support hunting and wildlife viewing, and it should grow even more in two years.

Friday, January 21, 2011

What are you meant to hunt with THAT? Giant killing machine is star attraction at shooting sports convention

By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 4:59 PM on 19th January 2011

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1348512/Vegas-gun-fair--supposed-hunt-that.html#ixzz1BfK7hv3B

It is less than a fortnight since six people were killed and Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords terribly injured in a shooting spree in Arizona.
But the Tucson massacre has done nothing to deter the 16,000 expected to attend the 33rd National Shooting Sports Foundation's Shooting, Hunting and Outdoor Trade convention in Las Vegas.

The annual event (which goes by the all-too-accurate acronym SHOT) is taking place at the 630,000 sq ft Venetian Hotel and Casino.
Among the wares on offer is this extraordinarily large Heckler & Koch many visitors were eyeing with some excitement. 
Taking aim: A customer tries out a grenade machine gun at the National Shooting Sports Foundation's 33rd annual Shooting, Hunting and Outdoor Trade (SHOT) Show at the Sands Expo and Convention Center in Las Vegas (see information box below)
Taking aim: A customer tries out a grenade machine gun at the National Shooting Sports Foundation's 33rd annual Shooting, Hunting and Outdoor Trade (SHOT) Show at the Sands Expo and Convention Center in Las Vegas (see information box below)
Empowering: The GMG fires 350 40mm grenades a minutes and has been used by armies around the world - but what can you hunt with it?
Empowering: The GMG fires 350 40mm grenades a minutes and has been used by armies around the world - but what can you hunt with it?

BIG SHOT: THE FACTS

Developed by arms manufacturer Heckler & Koch, the GMG is an automatic grenade launcher originally made for the German army in the mid-1990s.

The GMG - Granat Maschinengewehr or grenade machine gun - fires 40mm grenades at a rate of around 350 rounds per minute.
It is used for long-range bombardments in war zones and is not available for civilian use.
The ambidextrous belt-fed weapon can be loaded from either side and weighs a hefty 64lbs. Its tripod weighs an additional 24lbs.

The GMG is 109cm long, with a barrel measuring 415mm in diametre. An ammunition box holding grenades straps onto the gun's side.

Less than 400 have been manufactured for armies a
round the world.

Canada has ordered 304 GMGs, while Britain purchased 44 in 2006 for use in Afghanistan and Iraq.
The German-made Granat Maschinengewehr, or grenade machine gun (GMG), fires out 350 40mm grenades a minute.

Quite what quarry would require such a ludicrous sized weapon remains something of a mystery.

The gun was one of the stars of the show, which opened yesterday and goes on until January 21.


Barbara Heetderks of Dallas elbowed her way through a throng of arms dealers, shooting range owners, military buyers and law enforcement officers in search of the perfect ammunition for 'Maya', 'Joe' and the other 40 rifles and pistols that make up her personal gun collection.


'It's packed in here,' observed Heetderks of the crowd at the SHOT mega-show.
She was clad in a shirt emblazoned with the flag of Texas and a broach that read, 'I'm the NRA (National Rifle Association ) and I vote.'


Representative Carolyn McCarthy, a New York Democrat, introduced legislation in Washington yesterday that seeks to ban large capacity ammunition magazines like those recovered at the Arizona crime scene.

Her husband was killed and her son seriously wounded in a 1993 shooting on the Long Island railroad.


'Even gun owners, NRA gun owners, have said to me there is no reason why we need to have these large capacity clips, especially for personal security,' she said.
'I just hope people understand we are not after their guns but there are things we can do to protect lives.'


Tensions between public safety and constitutional rights have flared up after previous mass shootings and have resulted in little change.

But anti-gun advocates are hopeful Congress will be pushed into action now that one of their own was attacked.


'This (large capacity) magazine is designed for one thing - to take out as many people as possible,' said Joshua Horwitz, executive director of the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence in Washington D.C..

Aiming high: A man, one of 16,000 people at the convention, looks through the sights of a rifle
Aiming high: A man, one of 16,000 people at the convention, looks through the sights of a rifle

At the Las Vegas convention, buyers dressed in military uniforms mingled with gun dealers, with shinning displays of M-14s, long range rifles, Glocks, Smith & Wessons and knives with names like the 'Lil Fixer' cramming every nook.

Exhibition booths spilled into the adjacent Sands Expo Convention Center.
Organisers said those affected by the shooting were in their prayers, but urged lawmakers not to link the killings to gun laws.

'The recent tragedy in Tucson was not about firearms, ammunition or magazine capacity,' said Ted Novin, spokesman for the National Shooting Sports Foundation.


'It was about the action of a madman.'


Traditionalists also groaned at the prospect of any new battle over gun rights.
Hot shot: Customers wandered though the 63,000 square feet convention which ends on January 21
Hot shot: Customers wandered though the 63,000 square feet convention which ends on January 21

'I think it's absolutely ignorant,' said Chris Marshall, a sales director at the Big Darby Creek Shooting Range in Ohio, as he toured the Las Vegas show.
'This was a very ill young man and they are trying to pin this on all gun users.'
Rules in the convention hall were strict, however, with no one under the age of 16 allowed and personal firearms banned.

Iain Harrison, a spokesman for Crimson Trace, an Oregon-based manufacturer, said participants flock to the show each year mostly to put a face to the distributors they have worked with.
Harrison's firm showed off more than 62 models, including a Smith & Wesson with a light and laser that wasn't slated to hit the market until late last night.

Shoot on sight: Thousands of guns were on show in the largest weapons convention in the world
'This has been growing year after year,' Harrison said of the show. 'Nothing draws a crowd like a crowd.'


Crimson Trace sells firearms to law enforcement agencies and private citizens.
'Any legislation that restricts the Second Amendment would not be good for us,' Harrison said.


For some, the right to bear arms represents a more personal battle.


Heetderks said she began carrying a gun every day after she was raped some years ago.
'I'm not physically strong enough to fight off a man,' she said of her assailant. 'If I had a gun, I would have killed him.'

Shoot on sight: Thousands of guns were on show in the largest weapons convention in the world.

Thursday, January 20, 2011


The Huffington Post
Posted: January 20, 2011 01:55 PM
It's tempting, after a hideous event like the shooting in Tucson, to want to "do something" about gun violence. But let's pause to consider what that something could be, and what price we might pay for doing it.

Much has been made of Arizona's notoriously lax gun laws. But Arizona law was irrelevant to Jared Loughner's purchasing the gun. The background check is federal, and he passed it. Yes, his carrying concealed to the Safeway, without a permit, was legal under Arizona's new law, but if it hadn't been, would he have been dissuaded? He headed off to commit murder; he was already far over the line where a concealed-carry law would have made any difference to him.

As a liberal Democrat, I worry about the damage we might do by rushing toward a fresh raft of gun-control laws. It's very hard to demonstrate that most of them -- registration, waiting periods, one-gun-a-month laws, closing the gun-show loophole, large-capacity-magazine restrictions, assault-rifle bans -- have ever saved a life. It's a hard thing to accept, but in a country of 350 million privately owned guns, the people who are inclined to do bad things with guns will always be able to get them. One might as well combat air crashes by repealing gravity.

I'm not one for slinging statistics, because everybody can read into them what he wants to see. One, though, seems pretty hard to ignore: The rates of murder and other violent crime have dropped by about half in the past 20 years -- one piece of unalloyed good news out of the past two decades. During those same 20 years, gun ownership has gone way up, and gun laws have become far looser.

Gun guys are convinced there's a causal relationship -- they say that criminals become timid in the face of an armed citizenry. I think the crime drop has more to do with changing demographics and smarter policing. Either way, it is obvious that more guns and looser gun laws did not cause crime to rise. We on the left, who have an impulse toward ever tighter gun laws, need to look squarely at that. If what we want to do is reduce violent crime, perhaps we should continue what we're doing. While it may be true that nothing can be done to keep guns out of the wrong hands, it is plainly false that nothing can be done to reduce violence. Lots is being done, and quite successfully. It just doesn't involve restricting guns.

Gun control not only does no practical good, it actively causes harm. It may be hard to show that it saves lives, but it's easy to demonstrate that we've sacrificed a generation of progress on things like health care, women's rights, immigration reform, income fairness, and climate change because we keep messing with people's guns. I am researching a book on Americans' relationship to their guns, and keep meeting working-stiff gun guys -- people whose wages haven't risen since 1978 and should be natural Democrats -- who won't even listen to the blue team because they're convinced Democrats want to take away their guns. Misguided? Maybe. But that's democracy for you. It's helpful to think of gun control as akin to marijuana prohibition -- useless for almost everything except turning otherwise law-abiding people into criminals and fomenting cynicism and resentment. All the talk of a new large-magazine ban hits gun guys' ears like liberals using this disaster to trim back gun rights a little. It reinforces the toxic narrative that the Democrats are the enemy of regular guys, which is the last thing we need right now.

If, say, a ban on large-capacity magazines would actually do some good -- i.e. save some lives -- we could argue about whether it's worth taking some heat from the gun guys over it. But politics is a cost-benefit analysis -- what are you going to get vs. what you're going to lose. In this case, progressives have a tremendous amount to lose, and almost nothing to gain. As a nation, we have a lot of work to do on many fronts, and all of it is going to require cooperation. Let's not make the job harder, in our hour of grief, by blindly running toward new gun-control "solutions" that will do little if anything to prevent further tragedies.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dan-baum/after-tucson-stricter-gun_b_811696.html?view=print
FIREARMS:

In spite of recession, gun business surging

Trade show emblematic of enthusiasm in America for weapons: Requests for permits have shot up across the nation an in Nevada

Image
David Kohnow, of Long Range Accuracy, looks over a Heckler & Koch automatic grenade launcher during the National Shooting Sports Foundation’s 33rd annual Shooting, Hunting and Outdoor Trade (SHOT) Show at the Sands Expo & Convention Center Wednesday, January 19, 2011.
Thursday, Jan. 20, 2011 | 2 a.m.

2011 SHOT show

 
The gun business is surging, both nationally and in Nevada, evidenced by the more than 55,000 industry types who attended the National Shooting Sports Foundation trade show at the Sands Expo & Convention Center this week.

The robust firearms economy is showing striking defiance of the recession, as well as the ritual condemnations of gun violence in the wake of the recent shooting of 19 people, including a congresswoman, in Tucson.

Just as the recent electronics trade show gave the world tablet computers, so too did the Shooting, Hunting & Outdoor Trade (SHOT) Show give us the latest in shooting products.

Smith & Wesson’s Governor revolver allows for three types of ammunition at the same time. The sleek M&P 15 Sport Rifle will retail for $709. European scopes and custom gun parts from a Tucson machinist can improve upon an ordinary gun. Liberty gun safes, which are the size of a human, will keep your pieces safe. The Heckler & Koch .40-mm grenade machine gun is imposing, although not for home protection.
“It’s like waking up on Christmas everywhere you turn,” says an appreciative John Brand of Logan’s Gun Shop in Oklahoma.

The big, enthusiastic crowd would appear to be emblematic of the wider gun market: In 2009, the FBI and states processed 14 million requests through the instant background check system, up from 12.7 million in 2008.

In Nevada, the number of firearm background checks increased from 60,000 in 2007 to 94,000 in 2009, an increase of more than 50 percent. The figure dipped, although not much, in 2010.

Gary Giudice, a spokesman for Smith & Wesson, says guns have been a growth industry for years as more Americans experience the fun and challenge of hunting and target shooting or decide they want to arm themselves for protection.

By most accounts, though, there’s another reason for the spike in gun sales in recent years — what we might call the “Obama effect.”

The FBI recorded a sharp spike in background checks in the latter half of 2008.
The gun rights lobby and the conservative blogosphere sounded an alarm that President Barack Obama and a Democratic Congress would curtail gun rights, which sent many consumers scurrying into stores to stock up on guns and ammunition.

With time, however, the charge is looking baseless. Neither the Obama administration, nor its allies in Congress, have shown any interest in gun-control legislation, lest it hurt them in moderate states and districts.

Jennifer Duffy of the Cook Political Report notes that since Democrats blamed a spate of gun-control legislation for big losses in 1994, the party has all but surrendered on the issue.

Democrats can also be heard blaming gun control for Al Gore’s inability to win his home state of Tennessee in 2000, which would have delivered the presidency.
As a result, they’ve largely walked away from gun control.

Michael McDonald, a George Mason University political scientist, says, “The needle on public opinion has moved so far, and the political needle has moved so far away from gun control, that it’s hard to imagine the Democrats wanting to touch this.”

Indeed, the most striking aspect of the aftermath of the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords in Tucson this month has been the relative quiet on the issue of gun control, especially compared with school shooting incidents, which often have unleashed a loud and vituperative national debate over gun control.

The alleged shooter, Jared Loughner, legally bought a Glock 19 months before the shooting, and a high-capacity ammunition magazine was found at the crime scene.
Although the Tucson incident received more attention than most gun violence, it fit a long-standing pattern: As Time magazine recently reported, among 23 high-income countries, the U.S. had 80 percent of the gun deaths and a gun homicide rate nearly 20 times higher than the rest of the sample.

Gun-rights advocates point out that many of the homicides are committed with illegal guns, noting that enforcement of current laws would prevent many gun deaths.

Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., said he would vote to re-up the assault weapons ban, which expired in 2004, but quickly walked back his statement, saying — correctly — that there is zero chance the ban would come up for a vote and that he’s not pushing for it.

Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, D-N.Y., introduced legislation to ban high-capacity ammunition magazines, but the legislation probably won’t even reach the House floor.

At the SHOT show, many attendees said it was a tragedy what happened in Tucson, but noted that the apparently mentally ill man would have found a different weapon if he didn’t have a Glock. Also, with 280 million guns in America, nearly one for every man, woman and child, it’s not clear how effective gun-control measures can be.
Dawn and Jeff Stucker, who own a target shooting range in Asheville, N.C., and were inspecting the Smith & Wesson Governor, says they’re watchful of their customers, looking for red flags. “If something doesn’t feel right, it’s probably not right,” Dawn Stucker says.

The solution to America’s problem with violence is better parenting, Jeff Stucker says.
“Spend more time with the children, and figure out what they’re about.”
http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2011/jan/20/guns-shoot-popularity/

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

1992 Colt Mustang

From the Shot Show In Las Vegas
Far too much tactical and law enforcement.  The most exciting thing is Colt is reintroducing the Mustang .380.  Everyone will say it's a day late and a dollar short, but it was a great gun then and it's a great gun now.

In gun debate, education would help

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Bill would let Neb. teachers carry guns in schools

The Associated Press
Tuesday, January 18, 2011; 7:05 PM


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/18/AR2011011805287.html


LINCOLN, Neb. -- A Nebraska lawmaker has introduced a bill to allow school administrators, teachers and security staff to carry concealed handguns in schools.

Sen. Mark Christensen of Imperial introduced the bill two weeks after a 17-year-old killed his vice principal and shot his principal before killing himself.

Christensen says he has always opposed a ban on handguns in schools, but he had no plans to introduce his bill until the shootings on Jan. 5.

He says many schools don't even let security officers carry guns, leaving students and school employees "helpless in the face of a shooter."

The National Conference of State Legislatures says 42 states and the District of Columbia have banned guns in schools, but it could not say whether any states allow them.

Sticking to their guns, pro or con
By Fredrick Kunkle and Rosalind S. Helderman/The Washington Post
Tuesday, January 18, 2011; B01


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/17/AR2011011704381_pf.html

RICHMOND - Tucked into the Rev. John Hilton's shirt pocket was a miniature copy of the Gospel. Tucked into his belt was a 9mm handgun.

Hilton, whose clerical collar peeped out from a jacket showing a blaze-orange "Guns Save Lives" sticker, said there is no contradiction in carrying a Jimenez Arms semiautomatic and the New Testament, just as there is no contradiction in the idea that only by increasing access to firearms would society be a safer place.

"Even in the Bible, Christ told the disciples, 'Those who do not have a sword, let them sell their cloak and buy one,'" said Hilton, 56, an EMT who drove from Accotink, Va., to stand in solidarity with about 200 other activists lobbying the Virginia General Assembly for increased gun rights.

Many carried guns, openly or concealed, into legislative buildings, including a man who waited outside his state senator's office with a semiautomatic AR-15 rifle on his shoulder.

A short time after that rally, the Rev. Jonathan Barton, general minister of the Virginia Council of Churches, met beneath the same Bell Tower on the Capitol grounds with a much smaller band of demonstrators, including survivors of the 2007 Virginia Tech massacre, to call for stricter gun laws.

"Lord, we pray this day that those who turn to guns would hammer them into school textbooks," Barton said, a play on the biblical passage about transforming swords into plowshares. They urged support for a bill by Del. Patrick A. Hope (D-Arlington) that would prohibit firearms in the Capitol and General Assembly building.

Monday was Lobby Day at the Virginia General Assembly, drawing thousands of advocates who argued for a host of causes, including legalizing marijuana, repealing federal laws and their views on gun control. Environmentalists with Sierra Club stickers crowded into elevators with tea partiers, some of whom dangled tea bags or waved "Don't Tread on Me" banners. People in polarized camps traipsed the same halls, but sometimes their causes coalesced in one person, such as the fellow who wore a NORML button (for the marijuana-law reform group) next to pro-gun stickers.
But the day was often dominated by the passionate debate over guns, intensified by the mass shooting in Tucson that killed six and injured more, including Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.).

Last year, gun-rights backers put forward more than 60 bills, including a measure that would allow people to carry concealed firearms into places that served alcohol and another that would have repealed Virginia's limit on buying more than one handgun a month. The guns-in-bars bill passed; the repeal of one-gun-a-month did not.

This year, those supporting gun rights are working to pass HB2069, to allow law-abiding citizens to carry concealed weapons without obtaining a special license. They also lobbied for HB1732, which would require Virginia to recognize concealed weapons permits issued by other states, and HB1731, which would bar the federal government from regulating weapons manufactured and sold in Virginia.

"I've gotten some stares," said D.J. Dorer, 23, of Yorktown, who waited outside the office of Sen. Thomas K. Norment Jr. (R-James City) with the AR-15. "I'm not trying to cause a ruckus. I just want to show that I can come with it and then I can go, without any problems happening."

At the rally sponsored by the Virginia Citizens Defense League, Del. L. Scott Lingamfelter (R-Prince William), who had sponsored the unsuccessful repeal last year, asked for a moment of silence for the Tucson victims.

Philip Van Cleave, the defense league's president, said that if more private citizens had been armed at the Tucson grocery store where the shooting occurred, they might have intervened, while York County Sheriff J.D. "Danny" Diggs warned that the Tucson killings could spur new gun-control efforts.

"There are going be those who try to take advantage of that tragedy and take advantage of our Second Amendment rights. Not only that - you can't even use a gun metaphor anymore," Diggs said.

Gun-control advocates, meanwhile, have renewed their push for closing the so-called gun-show loophole by requiring that all firearms buyers must undergo a background check at gun shows. Under current law, only transactions with licensed dealers require purchasers to submit to a background check. They also want to change a law permitting people to carry firearms in state legislative buildings, provided the gun owner has a concealed weapons permit. Several, however, said they were aggravated that lawmakers seem eager to enact protections for themselves that do not apply to the public.

"It sticks in my throat a little," said Andy Goddard, who heads the Virginia Center for Public Safety and whose son, Colin, survived the Virginia Tech shooting.
At their rally, gun-control advocates honored the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.'s lifelong ministry of nonviolent protest and noted that he had been a victim of gun violence. They wore blaze-orange stickers that read, "Background Checks Save Lives," and conducted the demonstration in a way similar to a memorial service.

Eighty roses were placed on the ground, one for each Virginia youth killed by guns in the past 12 months. In a call and response, the group recited a litany:
"Some 30,000 Americans die each year in the United States," Goddard said.
"And we grieve," the crowd answered.
"On average, 80 people are killed by guns every day, including eight children."
"And our hearts break."

Then, they lay down on the brick walkway for three minutes to symbolize those who had fallen to gun violence. Two women softly sang "We Shall Overcome."

Monday, January 17, 2011

Texans in Congress show no desire to curb guns

By RICHARD S. DUNHAM and STEWART POWELLWASHINGTON BUREAU

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/7384335.html

WASHINGTON — It says a lot about the appetite for gun control in Congress that only one Texan offered any gun-related initiative in the wake of the assassination attempt in Arizona that took the lives of six Americans and seriously wounded Rep. Gabrielle Giffords.

It says even more about the Texas delegation's staunch support for the Second Amendment that the proposal by Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Tyler, would expand gun rights to permit lawmakers to carry weapons around the nation's capital.

"We don't need to spend millions on massive security details to escort everyone 24/7," said Gohmert, who has earned an "A" grade from the National Rifle Association.

"We can just allow those who have been trusted by hundreds of thousands of people and sent to our crime capital (of Washington) to protect themselves while in that federal enclave."

While the Jan. 8 Tucson massacre has prompted a nationwide debate over the sales of so-called "extended magazines" allegedly used by 22-year-old Jared Loughner, accused in the shooting spree, it hasn't done anything to increase support within the Texas delegation for any new curbs on guns or ammunition.

"We need to go to the root cause of the incident," said Rep. Gene Green, D-Houston, who has earned an "A" grade from the National Rifle Association. "It wasn't the instrument; it was the person who did it."

We 'know the ending'

Congressional opponents of gun control say there's little appetite for it on Capitol Hill.
"I don't see these bills going very far," said Rep. Kevin Brady, R-The Woodlands, who receives an "A" from the NRA. "Frankly, I'm tired of politicians trying to further their agendas on the backs of victims of any tragedy."

With a solid wall of opposition to gun control among House Republicans and a bipartisan Senate majority, political observers expect little, if any, change in gun laws because of the shooting of Giffords, a strong Second Amendment supporter.
"My bet is no change in gun laws one way or the other," said University of Virginia
political scientist Larry Sabato. "We have been through the Tucson scenario many times, from assassinations to Oklahoma City to Columbine. We've seen this movie and know the ending. No change. Blue Dog Democrats and Republicans aren't going to risk the wrath of the NRA and their own pro-Second Amendment voters."

Those two factors - the NRA and pro-Second Amendment voters - have guided the gun control debate for the past 16 years, ever since Congress enacted the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act in 1993, which mandates a background check for most firearms purchases. The law took its name from James Brady, the White House press secretary wounded in the 1981 assassination attempt on President Ronald Reagan.

In the 1994 election, dozens of supporters of the Brady law were defeated in a gun-rights backlash. Among the most prominent losers that year was Texas Rep. Jack Brooks, D-Beaumont, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee who voted against the Brady provision but was punished for allowing it to advance to the House floor for final approval.

Just eight Texas representatives - all Democrats - voted for Brady restrictions in 1994. Only one of them, Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Dallas, remains in Congress today.
The other 24 Texas House members and senators, including a majority of Democrats, opposed the Brady law. Five of them continue to serve in the House: Green, Joe Barton, R-Ennis; Ralph Hall, R-Rockwall; Sam Johnson, R-Plano; and Lamar Smith, R-San Antonio.

Law expired

In the aftermath of the 1994 electoral debacle, which cost Democrats both houses of Congress, national Democratic candidates consciously shied away from action on gun control. The 1994 assault weapons ban, which outlawed 19 types of military-style assault weapons as well as large-capacity gun magazines, was allowed to expire in 2004 by a Republican Congress, despite being supported by President George W. Bush. The House didn't even conduct a vote; Senate backers of the law could muster only ten votes. Texas Sens. Kay Bailey Hutchison, who has earned a 100 percent score and an "A+" grade from the NRA, and John Cornyn, who receives an "A" from the NRA, both voted against extending the Brady provisions.

The NRA's clout in Texas continues to grow. In the 2010 election, the association backed 11 House candidates. All were victorious.

Twenty-one of the 32 Texas House members received grades of "A" or "A+" from the NRA. Two others received a "B+" and "B."

The state's only gun-control supporters represent large urban centers: Reps. Lloyd Doggett, D-Austin; Charlie Gonzalez, D-San Antonio; Al Green, D-Houston; Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Houston; and Johnson.

It's the shooter

The 2010 election only strengthened the hand of gun-rights backers. According to the NRA, the new Congress has gained 39 new "A" graded lawmakers and has lost 19 with an NRA grade of "F."

Despite those political obstacles, Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, D-N.Y., is pushing for legislation that would restore the ban on high capacity gun magazines. The Senate's leading gun-control advocate, Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., says she is "looking at all of the options" and wants to "talk to my colleagues on both sides of the aisle about this." Activists are pressuring President Barack Obama to join the effort.

"Sensible gun laws can save lives," said Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. "Congress should move now to enact tougher restrictions on guns, ammunition, and who can legally possess them, and President Obama should help lead the way."

Such sentiments receive little sympathy in the Texas delegation, where lawmakers say that protection of individual liberty is paramount.

"It's the shooter, not the gun," said Rep. Ted Poe, R-Humble, who receives an "A" from the NRA. "Unfortunately, liberals want to use this tragedy to attack the Second Amendment. The academic elites, and some in Congress, would be wise not to commit more violence against our constitutional rights."

Gene Green, while opposing new gun restrictions, says the Tucson shootings could begin a useful debate about mental health issues. "If there is something we need to do that would keep firearms out of the hands of the mentally ill, I think we should do that."
richard.dunham@chron.com
stewart.powell@chron.com

Sunday, January 16, 2011

Arizona is a place where even a TV station is called KGUN
By SAM STANTON
McClatchy Newspapers

At the Frontier Gun Shop toward the east side of this city, Jim Sharrah figures he can outfit you with a quality handgun or rifle, ammunition and pretty much whatever else you need in 15 to 20 minutes.

As long as you're a resident of Arizona and at least 21 without an adjudicated history of violence or mental issues, that's about how long the entire process takes, including the background check. You can walk out with the weapon loaded and tucked inside a coat, if necessary, no permit needed.

"I grew up here," the affable 68-year-old John Wayne fan said as he listened to radio replays of President Barack Obama's Wednesday memorial speech. "Back then, you could get out of school, and just go out hunting and shooting."
Since the mass shooting Jan. 8 that killed six people and injured 13 others, including Democratic Rep. Gabrielle Giffords of Arizona, a new national debate has erupted about gun control. One focus is whether laws such as Arizona's, which allowed 22-year-old Jared Loughner to purchase the 9 mm Glock allegedly used in the attack, are too lax.

But missing from the discussion is an understanding of the culture of this southern Arizona community of nearly 1 million people. People here own guns, lots of people - including Giffords, who owned the same model weapon she was shot with.

At least two of the people who helped tend to the wounded and subdue the gunman at the massacre were carrying concealed handguns, and people wearing pistols on their belts or carrying rifles in gun racks always has been a common sight here.

"I'm one of those guys you're going to have to pry it out of my cold dead fingers," said Mike Harris, a 64-year-old broker who performed CPR on two of the shooting victims while carrying a small concealed pistol.

Guns have been part of the fabric of Tucson society since the days of the Old West, and little has changed. Even the local ABC affiliate is known as KGUN-TV.

But Tucson is also known as a more moderate - some would even say liberal - enclave than the rest of this reliably red state is, and in the wake of the Jan. 8 attack some Tucsonans, including the sheriff, say there needs to be a new look at how Arizona handles gun laws.

"You can carry a gun in a restaurant and bars," Cheryl Clark, a 40-year-old financial adviser, said as she waited in line to attend the memorial service at McKale Center for victims of the tragedy. "They're talking about allowing guns in schools, in the universities, allowing professors and students to carry guns.

"I think it's a sad state of affairs that we've come to the point where we think everybody should be armed and dangerous. I mean, we are the Wild West; that's our history and our legacy."

To find that imagery, you need go no farther than Sharrah's Frontier Gun Shop, on busy
Grant Road
, directly across the street from a Boys and Girls Club and Doolen Middle School.

Frontier Gun Shop is one of 224 licensed gun sellers in Pima County.
Outside, the store sign advertises "Great Guns and Good Junk." Inside, you can find used pistols and rifles Sharrah picks up from collectors, estate sales or people who walk in wanting to sell them. Looking for a 1700s-era Irish pistol? He has one.

He also has enough cattle skulls, bridles and stuffed moose heads to outfit any self-respecting Southwestern home.

But Sharrah isn't a caricature. He's serious about gun safety and advises people to take courses before they purchase weapons. He says he always carries a concealed weapon, but he went through the state training that used to be required for that.

Arizona law now says that anyone who can legally own a gun can carry it concealed without a permit or training, a change Sharrah calls "stupid."

"I don't approve of it," he said. "I took the course. I already knew a lot, but I learned a lot from it. Mostly about safety - what to do and what not to do."
Mike Harris has similar views. The former Marine Corps drill instructor said he always carried a concealed pistol, a habit he picked up after being robbed repeatedly while he was the owner of several Sizzler steakhouses and frequently carried cash from the day's receipts.

But he considers himself a trained and knowledgeable gun owner.
Harris was at the scene of the shooting rampage because he wanted to visit a friend who works for Giffords. He arrived at the Safeway parking lot just moments after the shooting had stopped and the gunman had been detained.
Harris walks with a cane and says he's had several heart attacks, but he immediately began performing CPR on one victim, then rested when someone relieved him. Later, he turned back to start CPR on another.
He never thought of drawing his weapon, he said, because others had detained the shooter.

"Afterward, my wife said, 'What would you have done if you'd gotten there earlier?' " he said. "I would have killed him."

Harris still visualizes the carnage in the parking lot, and the physical residue of the attack.

"I was amazed at how many casings there were," he said. "I thought the guy had two guns because there were so many casings."

He notes that the suspect could have gotten a gun virtually anywhere he'd wanted to, and that gun ads run regularly in places such as the Dandy Dime, a local free shopper publication.

But Harris doesn't think the incident means tougher gun laws are needed.
Anyone who answers an ad placed by an individual offering a gun for sale can make the purchase with no scrutiny at all. Unlike at a gun shop, there's no background check; not even a check of identification is required.

"None at all," said Thomas Mangan, a spokesman for the Phoenix office of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. "If you're the owner and you sell it, you're not required to do anything. The same would apply to 100 guns.

"It's like you're selling a baseball card."

Because of that, there's no way to estimate reliably how many people in Pima County own guns or how many guns there are.

Gun rights advocates will tell you that's the way it should be, that government has no right to impose restrictions on gun ownership, and that Arizona is at the forefront of protecting the Second Amendment.

"I think some of the (negative) views that exist of Arizona come from states on the East Coast and West Coast that have created gun laws that are contrary to the Constitution," said Tommy Rompel, the 29-year-old owner of Black Weapons Armory, a few miles from Sharrah's shop. "You do have a large gun culture here.

"Most of our gun customers believe in being able to protect your home yourself."

Rompel's shop sells high-end weapons, mostly custom-designed versions of the AR-15 semiautomatic rifle that can be fitted with various components for different appearances.

"Like Lego blocks for adults," he said, standing in his shop with a pistol holstered to his side.

He also sells suppressors, or silencers. He said many of his customers wanted them because they didn't care to wear ear protection when target shooting and because "they're fun."

Rompel, whose store sits in a strip mall across a street from Duffy Elementary and a block from Rincon High School, understands the perception many people may have of Arizona after the mass shooting. A crew from Al-Jazeera, the worldwide news organization based in Qatar, interviewed him a few days after the incident, and he knows what to expect.

"We're getting thrown under the bus as Arizonans because of what happened," he said.

But he and others said there were elements of life in Arizona that made gun ownership desirable and, in many cases, necessary.

Budget cutbacks have trimmed police services at the same time that illegal immigration has increased, they say, and ranchers in rural areas along the border feel the need to provide for their personal safety.

The very nature of the region makes gun ownership a must for some people, locals said. Once you leave the developed areas, the desert can be an isolated and dangerous place.

Some horseback riders and hikers carry weapons because of the omnipresent rattlesnakes and mountain lions. Other residents note that living far out can mean long response times from law enforcement.

Televised scenes of people packing pistols near the state Capitol just two days after the shooting have drawn national attention, though, as has Arizona's law

that allows carriers of concealed weapons to enter bars or restaurants that serve alcohol as long as they don't imbibe.

Gun rights supporters say that simply allows a gun owner to enjoy a meal at a nice eatery. The Arizona State Rifle and Pistol Association maintains a "CCW Cafe" page on its website to help members find restaurants that are friendly to carriers of concealed weapons, and avoid those that aren't.

But it isn't as if Tucson is some throwback town patrolled by a marshal. It's a modern city filled with public art, even on the freeway overpasses, and it boasts a major university that's home to a world-class medical school that saved Giffords' life.

Some of the state's most liberal politicians got their start here, including the late congressman and presidential candidate Morris K. Udall.

Even people who say they understand that gun ownership is part of life in Tucson wonder whether things have gone too far, though.

Mary Harris, a 70-year-old Presbyterian minister who stopped by Giffords' office last week to offer her support, said she understood that seeing guns out in public could be jarring to newcomers.

"If you haven't grown up around here, it can be quite intimidating," she said. "And there are a lot of newcomers around town. It's unnerving for them."
Harris said she understood people who felt the need to carry handguns for self-defense, especially in rural or undeveloped areas. But she'd draw the line at a six-round clip, not the 31-round style Loughner allegedly used.

"Carrying a handgun to protect yourself is one thing," she said. "Carrying an assault weapon is just unnecessary."

(Stanton reports for The Sacramento Bee.)
By COLLEEN BUSH Post Correspondent
Last Updated: , January 16, 2011
Posted: , January 16, 2011



TUCSON, Ariz. -- Thousands of weapons enthusiasts, many openly packing heat, crammed into an Arizona gun show chock full of high-powered rifles and semiautomatic pistols yesterday -- a mere 13 miles away from last weekend's rampage.

Despite the 4,500 who filed into the Crossroads of the West Gun Show at the Pima County Fairgrounds throughout the day, a donation box at the entrance for the six dead and 13 wounded, including Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, sat nearly empty.

The audacious showing came as Giffords continued her miraculous recovery, with doctors removing her ventilator by inserting a tube in her windpipe to allow her to breathe without the help of machines.

Some 7,000 people are expected to attend the two-day gun extravaganza that features more than 100 vendors hawking massive arsenals of AK-47s, assault weapons, sniper gear and ammo.

"When guns are in the news, it inspires gun owners to get out and defend their Second and First Amendment rights," said show organizer Bob Templeton, adding that turnout was higher than expected.

Several vendors offered Glocks and 33-round extended clips -- the type used by Jared Lee Loughner, 22, in his Jan. 8 shooting rampage -- although sales were average.

New York Rep. Carolyn McCarthy plans to introduce legislation this week outlawing magazines that carry more than 10 rounds.

Meanwhile, a victim from last week's massacre, Eric Fuller, was arrested yesterday after allegedly saying "you're dead" to a gun-rights supporter as the two were speaking at a forum being taped to air on ABC today, the Arizona Republic said.

And a Long Island man, James Guarnaccio, 55, was arrested for allegedly making 40 harassing calls over a two-day span to the district office of Rep. Gary Ackerman (D-Queens).