Friday, January 14, 2011

McCarthy bill caps ammunition magazines at 10 bullets

By MIke Lillis - 01/13/11 05:35 PM ET
 
Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.) will introduce legislation next week capping ammunition magazines at 10 bullets, she announced Thursday.

McCarthy, whose husband was killed during a commuter train shooting in 1993, has said all week that she'd be proposing legislation to ban high-capacity clips like those allegedly used in Saturday's shooting in Arizona. But she hadn't specified the maximum number of bullets, hoping instead that some flexibility on her part might entice GOP leaders to support the bill.

Since the tragedy, however, Republican leaders have aligned themselves squarely against gun reforms proposed even by members of their own party.

The 1994 assault-weapons ban included the same 10-bullet cap, but that law expired in 2004.

Like the assault-weapons ban, McCarthy's bill will ban high-capacity magazines manufactured after the law is enacted — meaning it doesn't prohibit possession of those made beforehand.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/137885-mccarthy-bill-caps-ammunition-magazines-at-10-bullets

The New York Democrat said it's impossible to estimate the effects of her proposal, but it will "ultimately save lives."

"The only purpose for the existence of these devices is to be able to shoot as many people as possible as quickly as possible," McCarthy wrote Thursday in a "Dear Colleague" letter to House members. "There is no reason that these devices should be available to the general public."

McCarthy is scheduled to introduce the bill formally on Tuesday.
Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/137885-mccarthy-bill-caps-ammunition-magazines-at-10-bullets

Thursday, January 13, 2011

The answer to gun violence is always more guns

In the wake of the Tucson shootings, U.S. Rep. Peter King, a Republican from New York, introduced a piece of legislation that would bar possession of a firearm within 1,000 feet of a member of Congress.

It’s really a silly, even dangerous idea. With all that is going on, why on earth would members of Congress want to deny themselves the sense of security and safety that comes from knowing that at any time, they could be within easy reach of a heavily armed constituent? It’s absurd.

King’s Republican colleague, Louie Gohmert of Texas, has a far better idea.
Texas Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert says his office is drafting a measure to allow members of Congress to carry guns in the District of Columbia, including in the Capitol and on the House floor.
Gohmert says he and his colleagues need to be able to protect themselves, in light of the mass shooting in Arizona.
“It’d be a good thing for members of Congress who want to carry a weapon in the District,” he said. “I know friends that walk home from the Capitol. There’s no security for us,” he said, adding that the measure would deter people from attacking members. “There is some protection in having protection.”
Now that — that’s a great idea. Brilliant. We want members of Congress to be safer, and guns make you safer, ergo, let’s give them each a gun. Two members, Republican Jason Chaffetz of Utah and Democrat Heath Shuler of North Carolina, have already said they plan to carry concealed weapons in their home districts for protection. But why not on the House and Senate floor as well? What could be safer than 435 armed, argumentative politicians crowded into one House chamber?

In fact, rather than merely allow them to carry guns on the House and Senate floor, in the interest of safety we should require it. It might do wonders for civil discourse. Of course, we’d want to limit the guns to those members who could prove their sanity, which might cut down on the participation rate a bit.

Folks out in Arizona would no doubt support the general idea. A co-founder of the Arizona Citizens Defense League tells Dave Weigel of Slate that his group is drafting model legislation that it calls the Gifford-Zimmerman Act. (Gabriel Zimmerman, a Giffords aide, was killed in the attack.)

“It would require the Arizona Department of Public Safety to provide firearms training, using firearms confiscated by the state, to members of Congress and people who work for them,” league co-founder Charles Heller said. “Facilities would be made available to them in a way that wouldn’t interfere with the training of police and other safety employees.”

“”It would enable staffers and legislators, and it would drop gun laws and restrictions,” Heller told the Arizona Republic. “In other words, they could walk into a nuclear facility or school and be armed. It would exempt them from many of the other restrictions that exist in Arizona. Arizona has some fairly tough gun laws.”

Ah yes, those fairly tough gun laws. Arizona is one of just three states that don’t require a permit to carry a concealed weapon, and one of six to declare that guns manufactured in Arizona are exempt from federal regulation. At an appearance by President Obama a year ago, more than a dozen protesters showed up armed, legally, including one carrying an AR-15 assault weapon.

(For all you other AR-15 owners out there, a gun company in South Carolina is now offering you — yes, you! — a limited number of lower receivers inscribed with the inspiring words “You lie!”, in homage to U.S. Rep. Joe Wilson’s outburst at President Obama’s 2009 State of the Union. But you must act now, only 999 available!)
In fact, given the popularity of guns in Arizona, it’s downright amazing that Jared Loughner was able to fire off more than rounds from his high-capacity magazine — you know, the type of magazine that was illegal until we made gun laws weaker again in the name of public safety. Yet nobody with a gun was around to intervene! Imagine! Two unarmed men and a little old lady jumped Loughner and disarmed him as he attempted to reload.

One armed Arizona citizen, Joseph Zamudio, did rush to the scene, gun in hand, after the attack. But as he admitted later, he came around the corner and almost blew away one of the heroes who had subdued Loughner and was standing there holding Loughner’s handgun.

“Horrible, horrible,” Zamudio said. “That’s why I was very lucky. Honestly, it was a matter of seconds … two, maybe three seconds.” But Zamudio intends to keep taking his gun with him everywhere he goes. He doesn’t even want to fly anymore, because he knows that doing so would require him to surrender his gun.

That’s another rule we have to change. In the name of safety of course. Guns on airplanes, just to make everyone more secure.

As Arizona state Sen. Jack Harper told the Arizona Republic, “When everyone is carrying a firearm, nobody is going to be a victim. The socialists of today are only one gun confiscation away from being the communists of tomorrow.”

Gun control (still) won't work

After Tucson shooting, ineffectual solutions abound

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2011-01-12/news/ct-oped-0113-chapman-20110112_1_gun-control-mayors-against-illegal-guns-assault-weapons
 
January 12, 2011|By Steve Chapman
It has been a dismal decade for gun-control advocates. They lost the federal so-called assault weapons ban when it expired in 2004. The U.S. Supreme Court made history by proclaiming an individual has a right to own firearms for self-defense. A Democratic president came into office vowing not to take away anyone's guns.

So it's no surprise that anti-gun forces would take the mass shooting Saturday in Tucson, Ariz., as a rare opportunity to reverse their fortunes. It's also no surprise that their proposals are models of futility.

Gun control has faltered mainly because it hasn't worked. And nothing in the new recommendations offers hope of success.

The first idea came from Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, D-N.Y., who wants to ban all ammunition magazines holding more than 10 rounds — which was the rule under the assault weapons law. Her rationale is that the rampage ended when the shooter exhausted a clip that held at least 30 rounds and tried to reload, at which point he was subdued. With a 10-round clip, he could have been stopped sooner.

Maybe so. But Jared Loughner apparently put some planning into this attack, and had the laws been different, he might have planned around them.

Suppose he couldn't go to the gun shop and buy a new high-capacity clip. He could have bought a used one, which could be legally sold under the expired federal law. Or he could have bought extra weapons to avoid the need to reload — like the shooter in the 2008 Northern Illinois University slaughter, who had a shotgun and three handguns.
Passing a law to head off a freakishly rare occurrence is probably a waste of time.

Florida State University criminologist Gary Kleck says that of the hundreds of mass shootings that have occurred in this country, he knows of only one in which a gunman was stopped because he had to reload — a 1993 episode on the Long Island Railroad.
A measure offered by Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., offers even less promise. He wants to make it a crime to knowingly carry a firearm within 1,000 feet of a president, vice president, member of Congress or federal judge.

That would punish law-abiding citizens who have no aggressive intentions — say, someone who parks a block away from a campaign rally on his way to the target range. But it would have been only a paper barrier to Loughner, who ignored a host of laws on his way to shoot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords.

Jared Loughner’s gun: The assassin’s weapon of choice

12 January 2011

http://www.sanfranciscosentinel.com/?p=103422
Glock helped create the modern U.S. gun market — and has become a preferred killing tool for criminals and the mentally disturbed.
Philip Shenon on its allure — and allegations of corruption

By Philip Shenon
The Daily Beast
Gun-control advocates hope last weekend’s Arizona massacre will finally bring scrutiny to the secretive—and many say, sinister—Austrian company that made the semi-automatic pistol used to grievously wound Representative Gabrielle Giffords and leave six others dead.

The family-run gunmaker, the Glock company, headquartered in a small Austrian village north of Vienna, came from nowhere 25 years ago to turn itself into one of the world’s leading suppliers of handguns, with special success selling to U.S. law-enforcement agencies and private gun-lovers.

Glock helped recreate the American gun market, convincing its customers to replace clumsy six-bullet revolvers—once a gun of choice among private buyers—with lightweight, simple-to-fire, highly lethal semi-automatic pistols capable of pumping out dozens of rounds of ammunition without reloading. (Giffords was a Glock owner herself, telling The New York Times last year, “I have a Glock 9 millimeter, and I’m a pretty good shot.”)

While no one denies that the vast majority of Glock’s American customers are law-abiding, the company’s products have repeatedly turned up in the bloodied hands of criminals and the mentally disturbed, including Jared Loughner, the 22-year-old Arizonan charged with last weekend’s killings, and Seung-Hui Cho, the Virginia Tech senior who mowed down 32 people at the school in 2007.

Like Loughner, Cho carried a Glock 19, the company’s bestselling 9-millimeter pistol, in his murderous rampage across campus.

“Glock was one of a couple of companies that really introduced the capability of mass killing power in a handgun,” said Tom Diaz, senior analyst of the Violence Policy Center, a Washington-based gun-control group, and author of the book Making a Killing: The Business of Guns in America.

He described the Glock 19, which retails for between $400 and $600, as “the archetypical pocket rocket, a small concealable handgun,” capable of firing enough rounds to hit dozens of targets within seconds. The Violence Policy Center said its research showed that Glocks and similar semi-automatic firearms figured in most major mass shootings in the United States over the last 30 years.

Spokesmen for Glock in Austria and at its U.S. subsidiary in Smyrna, Georgia, did not reply to phone calls and emails from The Daily Beast for comment on the Arizona massacre and about the company’s business operations. In the past, Glock has insisted that its firearms are built to the highest standards of safety, and that it operates in the United States in strict accordance with American gun laws.

Whatever its response might be to the events in Tucson, Glock would find it difficult to deny that its phenomenal success in selling guns in the American market has come in spite of longstanding allegations of corruption within the company’s U.S. subsidiary, as well as murderous internal intrigue, including a 1999 assassination attempt against the company’s founder, Gaston Glock, blamed by European prosecutors on one of Glock’s closest business associates.

In the attack in a darkened garage in Luxembourg, a hit man, a former professional wrestler and French Legionnaire, attempted to bash in Glock’s skull using a hardened rubber mallet, a weapon apparently selected because it would leave a wound that would that appear accidental.

A fitness buff, Glock fought back and survived. Both the hit man and Glock’s disgruntled business associate were imprisoned after their convictions on the attempted murder charges.

In a major investigation of the company two years ago, BusinessWeek magazine reported that Glock was then the subject of an otherwise secret IRS investigation to determine if Glock had concealed profits from tax officials.

The magazine quoted the former head of the U.S. subsidiary, Paul F. Jannuzzo, as saying that Glock had “organized an elaborate scheme to both skim money from gross sales and to launder those funds through various foreign entities.” The magazine also quoted Jannuzzo, who was eventually charged by Georgia state prosecutors on racketeering charges, as alleging that “the skim is approximately $20 per firearm,” suggesting that millions of dollars has been hidden from the IRS over the years. The company insisted at the time it had been “victimized” by Jannuzzo and others and denied any wrongdoing.

An IRS spokesman in Washington refused to comment to The Daily Beast this week when asked if Glock was the subject of any continuing criminal tax investigation.
Company founder Gaston Glock, an engineer now believed to be in his early 80s, is grudgingly admired by his competitors in the U.S. gun market, both for his technological innovations and his marketing and lobbying savvy.

In 1982, Glock designed a handgun that could be molded from a tough but relatively cheap, plastic-like material instead of steel and that could hold dozens of bullets in a single, easy-to-replace cartridge. Police departments in the U.S. and elsewhere had long complained about their dependence on heavy metal pistols that needed to be reloaded after only a few shots.

Glock quickly won over the law-enforcement market in the United States and then, with the endorsement of its products by large police departments, took aim at the multibillion-dollar market for private gun buyers. According to the trade magazine Shooting Industry, Glock imported 602,000 guns into the United States in 2009, the latest year for which figures are available, representing more than a quarter of all the imported handguns that year.

For many gun-buyers, the appeal of Glock’s products only grew after the Bush administration and Congress permitted the federal assault-weapons ban to expire in 2004; the law had blocked the sale of gun cartridges that held more than 10 rounds of ammunition.

Since 2004, Glock has heavily promoted the fact that its lightweight pistols can hold more than 30 bullets. The latest promotional material on the company’s website notes that its pistols “can be loaded with a convincing number of rounds,” making its guns “superior in firepower to conventional pistol models of the same size.”

In Arizona, Jared Loughner was apparently convinced of the special value of a Glock, attaching a cartridge to his Glock 19 that reportedly held the maximum number of bullets possible for the gun—33.

“Glock has been very good at turning a regular handgun into a weapon of war,” said Daniel Vice, senior attorney with the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, another gun-control group. “Glock guns are made so they are very easy for anyone to shoot, and Loughner could fire more than 30 rounds without having to reload.”

Vice said the consequences of allowing the federal assault-weapons ban to expire in 2004 were obvious in that supermarket parking lot in Tucson last weekend. If the ban was still in place, Loughner could have been stopped long before he killed so many people, since he would have needed to stop and replace the cartridge, Vice said. “Loughner would have been limited to 10 rounds, which means that many lives in Arizona would have been saved.”

Philip Shenon is an investigative reporter based in Washington D.C. Almost all of his career was spent at The New York Times, where he was a reporter from 1981 until 2008. He is author of the bestselling The Commission: The Uncensored History of the 9/11 Investigation. He has reported from several warzones and was one of two reporters from The Times embedded with American ground troops during the invasion of Iraq in the 1991 Gulf War.

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

The Wall Street Journal

Rampage Gun's Reputation Built on Style, Ease of Use

Police and gun dealers say Glock semiautomatic pistols, including the lightweight model allegedly used in the Tucson rampage last weekend, are among the most popular firearms in the U.S. because they are easy to use, reliable and accurate.
GLOCK"The Glock is a very popular weapon, generally not only with the law enforcement but with civilians," said James Pasco, executive director of the Fraternal Order of Police, which represents about 330,000 street-level officers. "It's a well-made and easy-to-maintain weapon."

The handgun Jared Lee Loughner is accused of using to kill six people and wound 14 others also has a reputation for stylishness. Boxy, angular with an air of brute utility, the Glock is often featured in Hollywood films as the weapon of choice for both good and bad guys.

The Glock can even take its place among "classic" popular-culture gun styles—along with the Uzi, AK47, Thompson submachine gun and Colt 45, said Robert Thompson, a professor at Syracuse University.

"There are a number of guns that fall into the pantheon of popular culture," he said. "Guns are a lot like cars, and in some ways designer dresses and suits: They become classics."

Glocks began moving into the mainstream in the U.S. in the late 1980s as drug-related violence escalated. Police armed with six-shot revolvers often found themselves outgunned by criminals armed with semiautomatics—Glocks and other makes— that had large ammunition capacities.
Officers began switching to Glocks, allowing them to fire nearly triple the number of bullets before needing to reload. "I would say the plurality of law-enforcement agencies out there now use Glocks," Mr. Pasco said.

The Glock 19 that police say Mr. Loughner used Saturday is more compact than some models in the manufacturer's stable—it is about 6 inches long. It comes with a 15-shot magazine, though police say Mr. Loughner used an extended magazine that contained 33 bullets.

Glock, based in Austria, built a plant in Smyrna, Ga., in the 1980s and began producing the high-tech polymer firearm in the U.S. Over the years as it began to take hold in the law enforcement community,It is among the top 20 manufacturers of firearms in the U.S., according to data from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives.

Repeated attempts to contact Glock officials to comment were unsuccessful. In 2008, the last year for which data are available, the company produced over 70,000 semiautomatic pistols sold in the U.S. Sturm, Ruger & Company Inc., produced over 239,00 and Smith and Wesson made more than 303,000 pistols
The gunman in the 2007 Virginia Tech massacre also used a Glock 19, and another gun, but law-enforcement officials said it was not normally considered a gun used by criminals.

Glocks are more expensive than guns normally found at crime scenes. In Maryland gun stores, for example the Glock 19 sells for around $600. Andrew Raymond, co-owner of Engage Armament, Kensington, Md., said the model runs between $590 and $639. at his store and is "very popular.""They are ubiquitous throughout the world," he said. His store sells "an incredible amount to law enforcement and military personnel, first responders."

Mr. Raymond said their popularity stems from their reputation as being "exceptionally reliable and low-maintenance. They are good for the first-time shooter." Mr. Raymond said he, his business partner and their gunsmith carry Glocks. "We stake our lives on those things," he said.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704515904576076261511207484.html
Write to Gary Fields at gary.fields@wsj.com
Giffords shooting causes gun sales to skyrocket in Arizona, some buyers looking to stock up

Wednesday, January 12th 2011, 4:00 AM
A Glock 19 9MM pistol, similar to what Jared Lee Loughner used to shoot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords.
Sloan/AFP/Getty
A Glock 19 9MM pistol, similar to what Jared Lee Loughner used to shoot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords.

When Jared Lee Loughner opened fire on a crowd in Tucson Saturday, killing six and wounding Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and many more, reactions across America ranged from anger to grief to confusion.

But some took the tragedy as a call to buy arms.

Arizona gun store owner Greg Wolff told Bloomberg News he has seen sales of the Glock pistol surge since Loughner used the gun to attack Giffords.

"We're at double our volume over what we usually do," Wolff said this week.

He credits the boost in sales to the fact that some gun buyers fear the shooting will lead to stronger gun control legislation.

"When something like this happens people get worried that the government is going to ban stuff," Wolff said.

That concern may be a valid one. Members of Congress, like New York Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, have pushed for tighter laws in the wake of the attack.

McCarthy argued this week for legislation that would ban the type of gun magazine Loughner used in the shooting, which let him fire off 33 rounds before reloading. When he did run out of ammunition, heroic bystander Patricia Maisch was able to grab the magazine before he could reload.

FBI figures obtained by Politico show that gun sales in Arizona and other states shot up by significant percentages in the aftermath of the shooting.

In Arizona, one-day gun sales went up 60% Monday, just two days after the shooting, as compared to the same Monday in 2010.

And across the country, gun sales were up 5% over last year.

High on the list? The very model of Glock pistol Loughner used in the attack, which was also used by school shooter Seung-Hui Cho in 2007 during his massacre at Virginia Tech, which killed 32 students.

Gun sales skyrocketed after that shooting as well, according to federal records.

"Whenever there is a huge event, especially when it's close to home, people do tend to run out and buy something to protect their family," Don Gallardo, a manager at Arizona Shooter’s World in Phoenix, told Bloomberg. He predicts handgun sales will continue to grow this week.

Though Wolff called the shooting "horrible," he said the coverage has also likely boosted the Glock's profile.

"It's in the news now. I'm sure the Green Bay Packers are selling all kinds of jerseys today as well," he told Bloomberg. "I just think our state embraces guns."

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2011/01/12/2011-01-12_giffords_shooting_causes_gun_sales_to_skyrocket_in_arizona_some_buyers_looking_t.html

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Top Republican Rep. Pete King to Introduce Gun-Control Legislation

January 11, 2011 2:34 PM

ABC News’ John R. Parkinson reports:
The chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security Peter King, R-New York, announced today that he will introduce a bill that would ban knowingly carrying a firearm within 1,000 feet of certain high-profile government officials.

[Mayor Michael Bloomberg] and I have discussed that we are introducing in the next several weeks legislation which would make it a federal crime to carry a weapon within 1,000 feet of any event which is attended by the President, the Vice President, members of the Senate, members of the House of Representatives, Cabinet officials, including the CIA director as well as federal judges,” King announced this morning at City Hall in New York City.

The attempted murder of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Arizona, and the subsequent shooting that killed six people last weekend is the first notable assassination attempt of a public official that transpired into a mass shooting.

King said the legislation, which is still being written, is not only about protecting federal officials, but also about protecting the public at events with public officials.

In the United States, it is illegal to bring a gun within 1,000 feet of a school. Passing a similar law in the proximity of government officials would give federal, state, and local law enforcement a better chance to intercept potential gunmen before they pull the trigger, according to King.

“Right now you have situations such in Tucson, where a person is allowed to carry a weapon without a permit, and authorities have no power to even pat that person down or question them,” King said. “To me, it’s absolutely essential –not just to protect the individuals involved – not that members are a special class. The fact is they do represent the people who elect them.”

King is the first Republican to introduce gun-control legislation in the wake of Saturday’s shooting. Others, including gun control advocate Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, D-New York, have also said they will introduce legislation aimed at cracking down on firearms.

“It’s essential if we’re going to be able to continue to have contact and to have conversation between the public and the elected officials, that the public who is at these meetings who is at these meetings can be assured of their own safety,” King added.
New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg cited the Virginia Tech massacre along with the Tragedy in Tucson for exposing flaws in a “broken” background check system and called on the Congress to act to fix it.

“Just as we saw after Virginia Tech, the Arizona tragedy has once again exposed fatal cracks in our background check system,” Bloomberg said. “The law says that drug abusers can't buy guns, but even though Jared Loughner was rejected by the military for drug use and arrested on drug charges, he was able to pass a background check and buy a gun. It should be clear to everyone that the system is broken and it is time for our leaders in Washington to step up and fix it.”